2,223
edits
Changes
no edit summary
:: I might be over sensible to the Hospitality Exchange issues, due to their past... maybe too much, sorry. | It is less where the content can be distributed, more about the affiliation (where it comes to politics...). The content could be used and integrate in any case (also in other travel projects), or? | The non international name of Abgefahren was already criticized. | I like the objects of BeVolunteer (this also brings another thing into the discussion: BeWelcome / BeVolunteer). | I do not like a poll, I think a decision should be made by consensus. // Summerzized, I would say there are different things talk about. The backup and growth in the long run and the use of the content. Are those two issues interweaved? --[[User:Alex|Alex]] 15:28, 16 September 2007 (CEST)
:::No! No matter how we decide, we should definitely cooperate with both of them, if that is possible. And yes, also with wikitravel/wikivoyage/whoever. The important question is only the legal status of hitchwiki. --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]]<small><sup>[http://http://www.liftershalte.info/ site], [[user talk:MrTweek|wikitalk]]</sup></small> 16:17, 16 September 2007 (CEST)
===[[project:How we want to keep Hitchwiki|How we want to keep Hitchwiki]]===