Difference between revisions of "Hitchwiki:Dxc deletions"

From Hitchwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
:::Confused. How did [https://hitchwiki.org/en/index.php?title=Oaxaca_(City)&action=history this] happen, then, and a few more like it?--[[User:Zenit|Zenit]] ([[User talk:Zenit|talk]]) 15:51, 11 May 2021 (CEST)
 
:::Confused. How did [https://hitchwiki.org/en/index.php?title=Oaxaca_(City)&action=history this] happen, then, and a few more like it?--[[User:Zenit|Zenit]] ([[User talk:Zenit|talk]]) 15:51, 11 May 2021 (CEST)
 +
 +
:::: I had some very confusing situations until I decided to check only those marked as current, maybe is the same situation? Im checking right now to try and figure out what happened. One thing that im thinking is that I did perhaps some 20 to 40 articles before I realized the currents thing, perhaps I rolled back some stuff from very old edits and that messed up? im looking into it now.[[User:Warlo|Warlo]] ([[User talk:Warlo|talk]])
  
 
[https://hitchwiki.org/en/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Dxc&dir=prev&offset=20210205145839&target=Dxc 2021-02 2021-04] I finished checking all the "currents" on this one, rollbacked those where good and important information got deleted. [[User:Warlo|Warlo]] ([[User talk:Warlo|talk]])
 
[https://hitchwiki.org/en/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Dxc&dir=prev&offset=20210205145839&target=Dxc 2021-02 2021-04] I finished checking all the "currents" on this one, rollbacked those where good and important information got deleted. [[User:Warlo|Warlo]] ([[User talk:Warlo|talk]])

Revision as of 15:45, 11 May 2021

Nice to go over these and revert some of the deletions:

It might be easier to make a list of what still needs to be checked rather than what has been fixed? Perhaps I'll see if that can be done fairly easily.--Zenit (talk) 17:35, 10 May 2021 (CEST)

2014-07 2020-08 check: Warsaw, Barcelona, Berlin, Bergen, Trondheim, Leipzig

2020-08 2020-09 fixed Tehran, check: many

2020-09 2020-10 fixed Vigo, Algeciras, Coimbra, Lahti, check: many

2020-10 2020-12

2020-12 2021-01

2021-01 2021-02 I'll check the Currents in this one--Zenit (talk) 13:56, 11 May 2021 (CEST) -- Edit: I'll check everything. Page 1 done :-)--Zenit (talk) 14:09, 11 May 2021 (CEST)

Warlo, have you done those? Can we try to say what we will do before doing it so that we avoid losing time?--Zenit (talk) 14:29, 11 May 2021 (CEST)
Nope, I only did those from 2021-02 2021-04. I wrote a note on the chunk before i started working on it and only went for thoe i claimed.Warlo (talk)
Confused. How did this happen, then, and a few more like it?--Zenit (talk) 15:51, 11 May 2021 (CEST)
I had some very confusing situations until I decided to check only those marked as current, maybe is the same situation? Im checking right now to try and figure out what happened. One thing that im thinking is that I did perhaps some 20 to 40 articles before I realized the currents thing, perhaps I rolled back some stuff from very old edits and that messed up? im looking into it now.Warlo (talk)

2021-02 2021-04 I finished checking all the "currents" on this one, rollbacked those where good and important information got deleted. Warlo (talk)

Did you not find this edit worth reinstating? Or did you not see it? Just trying to understand if the way we're doing it is actually efficient.--Zenit (talk) 14:00, 11 May 2021 (CEST)

It seems like I didnt see it, as thats the kind of content im rolling back. Anyways ive gone thru the ones saying current only, maybe i skipped that one. Im planning to go over my edits as rolling back means that some of the positive edits from user DxC went away and i wanted to put them back in. Warlo (talk)

The ones marked as (current) are easier to handle.


If you have admin rights this may be easier because you can more easily roll back a bunch of edits.

Let guaka (talk) know if you want to help and you think it'll make it easier for you if you have admin rights.