Difference between revisions of "Talk:Napoli"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think we should let the '''wikitravel like''' content in the article! it is no spam and you might interessted in it. --[[User:Quarim|Quarim]] 15:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC) | I think we should let the '''wikitravel like''' content in the article! it is no spam and you might interessted in it. --[[User:Quarim|Quarim]] 15:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
: Hmm, difficult. I'd say some basics about a city can be find, but shouldn't be too much to avoid being redundant. We are not a travel guide. --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]] 15:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC) | : Hmm, difficult. I'd say some basics about a city can be find, but shouldn't be too much to avoid being redundant. We are not a travel guide. --[[User:MrTweek|MrTweek]] 15:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | : Sightseeing tips and museums don't belong here. They have nothing to do with hitchhiking. If a person has decided to hitchhike through a place, he has likely already read elsewhere about what it has to offer.[[User:CRCulver|CRCulver]] 21:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:56, 27 July 2010
I think we should let the wikitravel like content in the article! it is no spam and you might interessted in it. --Quarim 15:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm, difficult. I'd say some basics about a city can be find, but shouldn't be too much to avoid being redundant. We are not a travel guide. --MrTweek 15:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sightseeing tips and museums don't belong here. They have nothing to do with hitchhiking. If a person has decided to hitchhike through a place, he has likely already read elsewhere about what it has to offer.CRCulver 21:56, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
